Preliminary Validity of a Telephone-Based Neuropsychological Battery in a Consecutive Series of Persons with HIV Disease Referred for Clinical Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated use of remote assessments by clinical neuropsychologists. Telehealth was particularly important for vulnerable groups, including persons living with HIV (PLWH); however, limited internet access can be a serious barrier to care. This study examined the preliminary validity of a telephone-based neuropsychological assessment in a clinical sample of PLWH. METHOD: A consecutive series of 59 PLWH were assessed via telephone at an HIV clinic in the southern U.S. between April 2020 and July 2022. The battery included auditory-verbal neuropsychological tests of memory, attention, and executive functions, and questionnaires assessing self-reported mood and activities of daily living (ADL). RESULTS: Study measures demonstrated acceptable internal consistency. PLWH demonstrated worse neuropsychological performance compared with expectations derived from the normal curve and an HIV-seronegative adult sample (N = 44). PLWH assessed via telephone demonstrated similar impairment rates to that of a consecutive series of PLWH (N = 41) assessed in-person immediately prior to the pandemic. Higher telephone-based global neuropsychological scores were related to younger age, more education, better fund of knowledge, White race/ethnicity, fewer medical conditions, and fewer depression symptoms. Global neuropsychological impairment was strongly and independently associated with greater dependence in ADL domains, particularly for instrumental activities. CONCLUSIONS: Although telephone-based approaches to neuropsychological assessment are not ideal, these data provide support for the feasibility, internal consistency, and preliminary validity of this method in a consecutive clinical series of PLWH. The direct comparability of telephone-based and in-person neuropsychological assessments remains to be determined by prospective, counterbalanced study designs examining both PLWH and seronegative individuals.

Viral meningitis and encephalitis: an update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most common infectious etiologies of meningitis and encephalitis are viruses. In this review, we will discuss current epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the most common causes of viral meningitis and encephalitis worldwide. RECENT FINDINGS: Viral meningitis and encephalitis are increasingly diagnosed as molecular diagnostic techniques and serologies have become more readily available worldwide but recent progress in novel antiviral therapies remains limited. Emerging and re-emerging viruses that have caused endemic or worldwide outbreaks or epidemics are arboviruses (e.g., West Nile virus, Japanese encephalitis, Tick borne encephalitis, Dengue, Zika, Toscana), enteroviruses (e.g., Enterovirus 71, Enterovirus D68), Parechoviruses, respiratory viruses [e.g., severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza, metapneumoviruses, measles, mumps], and herpes viruses [e.g., herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, human herpes (HV) 6, varicella zoster virus (VZV)]. Future efforts should concentrate in increasing availability for those viruses with effective vaccination [e.g., Japanese encephalitis, Tick borne encephalitis, varicella zoster viruses, SARS-CoV-2, influenza], prompt initiation of those with encephalitis with treatable viruses (e.g., HSV-1, VZV), increasing the diagnostic yield by using novel techniques such as metagenomic sequencing and avoiding unnecessary antibiotics in those with viral meningitis or encephalitis. SUMMARY: We review the current epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of the common causative agents of viral meningitis and encephalitis worldwide.

Post-Lung Transplantation Outcomes and Ex Vivo Histopathological Findings in Severe Post-Covid-19 Pulmonary Disease-A Single-Center Experience.

Background: A significant proportion of patients with severe and persistent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) require continuous ventilatory support and occasional extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung transplantation is a treatment option for patients who develop severe ARDS. Methods: Our lung transplant database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent lung transplantation for COVID-19 pulmonary disease at Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas, from January 2020 to March 2022. We evaluated outcomes of patients who were followed in our clinic at least 6 months post-transplant. Pretransplant patient characteristics, COVID-19-related treatment, histopathology results, and postdischarge course were evaluated. Results: Among a total of 13 lung transplant recipients, 6 consecutive patients were identified who had a minimum of 6 months of follow-up post-lung transplantation. The average age of patients was 55 years, with a male predominance. The median time to transplantation was 111 days. All 6 patients had significant postinfectious complications due to COVID-19 before transplant. Histopathological findings from explanted lungs showed a predominance of fibrotic change. There were no reported cases of rejection or graft dysfunction. 5 patients had minimal to no post-transplant infectious complications. One patient died 218 days post-transplant from infectious complications. Conclusions: Five out of six lung transplant recipients at our institution have demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes after index hospitalization, for a mean follow-up of 13 months post-lung transplantation. Lung transplantation for lung fibrosis due to COVID-19 is an acceptable salvage treatment option. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Post–Lung Transplantation Outcomes and Ex Vivo Histopathological Findings in Severe Post-Covid-19 Pulmonary Disease—A Single-Center Experience

Background A significant proportion of patients with severe and persistent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) require continuous ventilatory support and occasional extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung transplantation is a treatment option for patients who develop severe ARDS. Methods Our lung transplant database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent lung transplantation for COVID-19 pulmonary disease at Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas, from January 2020 to March 2022. We evaluated outcomes of patients who were followed in our clinic at least 6 months post-transplant. Pretransplant patient characteristics, COVID-19-related treatment, histopathology results, and postdischarge course were evaluated. Results Among a total of 13 lung transplant recipients, 6 consecutive patients were identified who had a minimum of 6 months of follow-up post–lung transplantation. The average age of patients was 55 years, with a male predominance. The median time to transplantation was 111 days. All 6 patients had significant postinfectious complications due to COVID-19 before transplant. Histopathological findings from explanted lungs showed a predominance of fibrotic change. There were no reported cases of rejection or graft dysfunction. 5 patients had minimal to no post-transplant infectious complications. One patient died 218 days post-transplant from infectious complications. Conclusions Five out of six lung transplant recipients at our institution have demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes after index hospitalization, for a mean follow-up of 13 months post–lung transplantation. Lung transplantation for lung fibrosis due to COVID-19 is an acceptable salvage treatment option. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Lung transplantation for lung fibrosis due to COVID-19 can be considered a safe salvage treatment option with relatively low infectious post-transplant complications despite significant infectious complications before lung transplantation. Larger studies are warranted to confirm the findings.

Risk Classification for Respiratory Viral Infections in Adult Solid Organ Transplantation Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Molecular testing such as nasopharyngeal viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (NVP) is available now in most hospitals and widely used to identify respiratory viral infections (RVIs) in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study at 8 hospitals from March 1, 2016, to April 30, 2019. We included all adult SOT recipients who were admitted to the hospitals and had their first NVP post transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 102 adult SOT recipients were enrolled. NVP test was positive in 33 (32.4%) SOT recipients and negative in 69 (67.6%). Median age was more than 60 years old with female predominance in both groups. The majority of patients who had positive NVP were hospitalized either in fall or winter seasons (91%). RVI symptoms were documented in about 73% of the positive NVP group. Rhinovirus was the most common identified virus (48.4%). On logistic regression analysis, clinical presentation in fall or winter seasons, presenting with upper respiratory infection (URI) symptoms and taking prednisone ≥10 mg/d were significantly associated with positive NVP. This model classified patients into 3 categories of risk for RVIs-low (none of the variables), 0%; intermediate (1 variable), 6.5%; and high (≥2 variables), 55.4% with P < .001 for all predictors. CONCLUSION: SOT recipients who are taking prednisone (≥10 mg) and have URI symptoms in fall or winter seasons are more likely to have RVIs.